Conflicting and complementary conceptions of discursive practice in non-metaphysical interpretations of Hegel.
In: Philosophy & Social Criticism, Jg. 39 (2013-07-01), Heft 6, S. 559-576
academicJournal
Zugriff:
Pippin, Pinkard and Brandom are rightly seen as representatives of a distinct approach in contemporary Hegel scholarship. Still, their interpretations diverge due to different definitions and uses of conceptions of discursive practice. We focus on three ways in which such definitions and uses bear on their interpretations. First, while Lumsden has recently criticized Pinkard and Brandom for ‘discursive bias’ in their accounts of the contestation and upheaval of normative authority in Hegel’s Phenomenology, we note that Pinkard distinguishes between various modes of reason-giving, and we argue that a further qualification of interdependencies between these modes may support his interpretation against such criticism. Second, Pinkard and Pippin have recently criticized Brandom’s conception of discursive score-keeping practice, and Pippin in particular has argued that the latter rests on an individualistic reductionism about content foreign to Hegel. However, we find that the real issue is that the modes of methodological abstraction and idealization assumed for Brandom’s conception of discursive practice leave out of account the historical alteration as well as the institutional embodiment of normative authority as emphasized by Pippin and Pinkard. Third, while Pippin and Pinkard both make Hegel’s notion of modern ethical life bear on a conception of practical rationality, their uses of a conception of discursive practice in such an undertaking betray divergent conceptions of the sociality of rational agents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Philosophy & Social Criticism is the property of Sage Publications, Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Titel: |
Conflicting and complementary conceptions of discursive practice in non-metaphysical interpretations of Hegel.
|
---|---|
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person: | Midtgarden, Torjus |
Zeitschrift: | Philosophy & Social Criticism, Jg. 39 (2013-07-01), Heft 6, S. 559-576 |
Veröffentlichung: | 2013 |
Medientyp: | academicJournal |
ISSN: | 0191-4537 (print) |
DOI: | 10.1177/0191453712471657 |
Schlagwort: |
|
Sonstiges: |
|